Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,612,267 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 23.7 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $51,361, a difference of 29.8%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $63,346, a difference of 27.4%), and median family income ($95,573 compared to $118,053, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $55,028, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $66,087, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $43,317, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 68.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 65.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 85.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.15, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 77.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 132.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.0%).