Luxembourger vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Yakama

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,106,553 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 319.6 Yakama.
Luxembourger Integration in Yakama Communities

Luxembourger vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $33,009, a difference of 38.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $76,226, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $83,932, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,321, a difference of 7.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,234, a difference of 8.4%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.5%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.7%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 134.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 131.0%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 81.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 21.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
21.4%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 139.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 102.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.1%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.1%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 51.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households (63.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 9.5%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerYakama
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
40.3%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 95.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
12.9%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 123.7%), bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Luxembourger vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.5%).
Luxembourger vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%