Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,564,607 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.884. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 356.3 Yakama.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Yakama Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $33,009, a difference of 32.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $76,226, a difference of 24.7%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $45,002, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,234, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $33,354, a difference of 16.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
23.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 108.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 105.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 22.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
21.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 94.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (64.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
40.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 42.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
12.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 119.1%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianYakama
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%