Bhutanese vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Yakama

Exceptional
Poor
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,400,728 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 43.7 Yakama.
Bhutanese Integration in Yakama Communities

Bhutanese vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $33,009, a difference of 51.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $76,226, a difference of 43.7%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $83,932, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $54,321, a difference of 5.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $56,234, a difference of 28.5%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Income
Income MetricBhutaneseYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
23.7%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 132.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 118.7%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 42.1%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
21.4%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 128.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 93.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.4%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.1%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
80.6%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 98.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.9%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseYakama
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
40.3%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.8%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
12.9%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 97.3%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 81.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Bhutanese vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.4%).
Bhutanese vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%