Immigrants from Oceania vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,964,715 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 98.6 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $33,009, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $76,226, a difference of 28.1%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $83,932, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,321, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $56,234, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 88.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 78.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 105.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 90.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.45, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 69.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 58.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.4%).