Pima vs Yakama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Yakama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Pima
Yakama
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yakama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 30.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Yakama |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 79.5% | 52.1% |
| Range | 73.8% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 28.6% | 20.1% |
| Median | 24.8% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.2% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Yakama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |