Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,750,966 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.259% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 1,259.4 Yakama.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Yakama Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $33,009, a difference of 43.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $76,226, a difference of 30.5%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $83,932, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $56,234, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $54,321, a difference of 10.6%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.8%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 127.4%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 105.8%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.92%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 20.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
21.4%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 90.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 86.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
80.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.9%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
40.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 133.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 71.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 61.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
12.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 158.8%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 85.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), female disability (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynYakama
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%