Romanian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Lithuanians

Excellent
Excellent
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,228,582 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 113.6 Lithuanians.
Romanian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Romanian vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($111,243 compared to $115,395, a difference of 3.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $112,484, a difference of 3.6%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.15%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $42,108, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $50,991, a difference of 1.5%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricRomanianLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.2%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianLithuanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.74%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.77%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianLithuanian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Average
6.3%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Romanian vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Romanian vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianLithuanian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%