Japanese vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,087,000 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $49,448, a difference of 24.0%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $61,228, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $53,552, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $42,108, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($83,395 compared to $93,852, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.3%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.8%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 132.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%).