Choctaw vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,543,723 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 30.4 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $49,448, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $112,484, a difference of 36.7%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $115,395, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,552, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $65,209, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 59.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.4%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.7%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 60.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 51.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.5%).