Samoan vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,560,716 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Lithuanians.
Samoan Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Samoan vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $49,448, a difference of 24.2%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $61,228, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $50,991, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $65,209, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $53,552, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $93,852, a difference of 8.5%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricSamoanLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 25.2%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanLithuanian
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.45%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Exceptional
29.6%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
6.3%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.88%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Samoan vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.41%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Samoan vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricSamoanLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%