Shoshone vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,426,903 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $112,484, a difference of 34.6%), per capita income ($37,072 compared to $49,448, a difference of 33.4%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $115,395, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $53,552, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $42,108, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.1%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 56.3%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.10, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.8%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 62.6%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.8%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.3%).