Canadian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,974,865 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,597 compared to $115,395, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $49,448, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $105,223, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $53,552, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $65,209, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 14.8%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.5%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.5%).