Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,232,589 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.264% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 263.7 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $46,938, a difference of 16.2%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $110,159, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $58,835, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.56%), householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $64,521, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,680 compared to $108,471, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.6%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.97%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.94%).