Choctaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,440,881 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.942. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $108,471, a difference of 31.8%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $91,887, a difference of 31.4%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,938, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,729, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,521, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 47.8%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 39.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 45.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 69.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 58.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%).