Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,931,918 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 124.9 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $46,938, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $58,835, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $110,159, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $50,729, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $41,183, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.2%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.2%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 31.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.66%).