Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,542,883 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.493% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 492.6 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $50,729, a difference of 9.5%), per capita income ($49,463 compared to $46,938, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $58,835, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $64,521, a difference of 0.090%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $108,471, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.4%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.96%), single female poverty (18.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 35.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.43%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%).