Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,157,136 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $101,124, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $108,471, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $50,729, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $41,183, a difference of 7.3%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $49,682, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.6%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 44.7%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%).