Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,150,277 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 211.0 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $91,887, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $46,938, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $108,471, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,729, a difference of 0.97%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $58,835, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.8%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.64%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).