Uruguayan vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,445,110 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $38,088, a difference of 16.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $85,787, a difference of 15.0%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $73,747, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.47%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $54,922, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $35,661, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.1%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.090%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.9%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.28%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.55%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.0%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (92.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.8%).