Choctaw vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,647,425 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $38,088, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $35,661, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $48,202, a difference of 0.99%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $41,519, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $54,922, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.17%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.3%).