Bhutanese vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,671,515 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $85,787, a difference of 37.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $73,747, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $88,556, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $47,518, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,661, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 59.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.2%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.2%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 49.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.4%).