Crow vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,254,335 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.932. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.629% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 629.5 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 31.3%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $38,088, a difference of 20.0%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $73,747, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $47,518, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,661, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $41,519, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 63.9%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 59.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 270.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 269.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 201.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.7%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.25, a difference of 17.6%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.93%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.7%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.90%).