Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,288,078 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $82,152, a difference of 43.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $85,787, a difference of 42.5%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $73,747, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $47,518, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $54,922, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 55.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 51.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.38%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 46.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.89%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 88.7%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 85.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 67.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.7%).