Finnish vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,124,259 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 175.9 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $85,787, a difference of 16.5%), median family income ($102,676 compared to $88,556, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $82,152, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $35,661, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $54,922, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $47,518, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.9%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.25, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.5%).