Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Alaskan Athabascans

Exceptional
Fair
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,510,760 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 6.763% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 6,762.9 Alaskan Athabascans.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,163, a difference of 21.0%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $76,383, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $90,951, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Average
25.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 51.9%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 100.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 100.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 98.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.5%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
37.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
8.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.7%), bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.36%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
2.5%