Immigrants from Belarus vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,133,908 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.406% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 405.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $39,163, a difference of 28.4%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $49,748, a difference of 26.0%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $76,383, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.19%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $62,330, a difference of 0.27%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 85.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 85.4%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 81.6%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (63.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 70.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.2%), no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 63.3%), bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 88.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 61.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.4%).