Immigrants from Jamaica vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,944,381 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 36.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $88,446, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,851 compared to $76,383, a difference of 0.70%), median earnings ($43,026 compared to $43,393, a difference of 0.85%), and per capita income ($38,766 compared to $39,163, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 40.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 83.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 103.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.16%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.9%).