Immigrants from Jordan vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,047,041 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,412 compared to $76,383, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $90,951, a difference of 16.7%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $39,163, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.67%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $62,330, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 54.6%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 98.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 95.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.8%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 80.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 39.7%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.4%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 16.8%).