Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,828,382 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.455% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 455.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $62,330, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,713, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $88,446, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $49,748, a difference of 4.2%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $43,393, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,163, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 81.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 76.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.4%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 97.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 2.4%), male disability (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%).