Finnish vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,691,595 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $39,163, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $49,748, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.22%), median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $62,330, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.8%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 100.1%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 40.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 103.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 27.2%), associate's degree (46.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%).