Scottish vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,840,966 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 26.2 Immigrants from Nigeria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 28.3%), per capita income ($44,440 compared to $40,339, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $86,589, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $39,294, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $49,174, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $45,030, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.2%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 74.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 77.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).