Scottish vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,293,815 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 62.9 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 24.3%), median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $49,215, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $54,474, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $36,904, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $53,275, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $79,737, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 63.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.92%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.8%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 29.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (64.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 42.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 108.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.26%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.6%).