Romanian vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Romanians
Chickasaw
11.2%
MALE DISABILITY
50.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,848,419 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 34.9%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 50.8% | 56.8% |
| Range | 48.8% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 22.9% |
| Median | 11.7% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Haitian (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), New Zealander (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Honduras (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Luxembourgers | 61.9 /100 | #165 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 54.4 /100 | #167 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 54.0 /100 | #168 | Average 11.2% |
| Barbadians | 53.4 /100 | #169 | Average 11.2% |
| New Zealanders | 52.9 /100 | #170 | Average 11.2% |
| Haitians | 52.5 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Romanians | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 50.4 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Maltese | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 48.7 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Syrians | 46.6 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 44.2 /100 | #177 | Average 11.3% |
| Australians | 42.2 /100 | #178 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |