Romanian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Romanian
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Romanians
Chickasaw
10.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,766,958 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 25.3%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 59.0% | 32.8% |
Range | 58.0% | 30.3% |
Mean | 15.1% | 15.0% |
Median | 11.1% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Pakistani (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Icelander (10.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Carpatho Rusyn (10.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Hungary | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 96.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Koreans | 96.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Pakistanis | 95.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 95.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Mongolians | 95.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Icelanders | 95.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 94.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 94.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 94.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |