Romanian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Romanian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Romanians
Chickasaw
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,104,252 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,649,363 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 36.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.1% |
| Range | 98.1% | 54.4% |
| Mean | 30.7% | 27.1% |
| Median | 21.7% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.5% | 33.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.4% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Northern European (16.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Pakistani (16.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (16.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Peruvian (16.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Slovene (16.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Europeans | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 94.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Slovenes | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 94.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Romanians | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Pakistanis | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Peruvians | 94.1 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 94.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Albanians | 93.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Basques | 93.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (21.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Yaqui (21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cherokee (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |