Immigrants from Israel vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,702,417 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 52.0 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $37,407, a difference of 53.4%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $47,990, a difference of 43.2%), and median family income ($127,430 compared to $90,918, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $51,783, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $56,089, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 37.7%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.8%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 75.8%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 48.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 140.4%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 120.4%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.6%).