British West Indian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Chickasaw
2.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,668,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 84.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 21.2% |
| Range | 6.0% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (2.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |