British West Indian vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,411,209 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $96,537, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $57,580, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($40,330 compared to $40,434, a difference of 0.26%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $52,450, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $45,090, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.1%), single female poverty (22.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.5%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.33%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 191.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 113.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 27.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 84.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.2%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and associate's degree (42.4% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.48%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.87%).