British West Indian vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,238,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 48.1 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $37,825, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($40,330 compared to $37,952, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $83,311, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $50,071, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $50,301, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.5%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.41%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.1%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.060%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.88%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.5%).