British West Indian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,234,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 42.8%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $62,354, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $103,412, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $40,353, a difference of 0.13%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $47,697, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 55.8%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 170.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 75.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 26.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.1%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.2%).