Arapaho vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Arapaho
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Arapaho
Creek
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,689,796 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 0.010%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Creek |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 73.0% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 31.1% | 31.3% |
| Median | 27.3% | 28.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.8% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.55%), Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |