Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,662,642 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.925% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 924.7 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,372, a difference of 20.4%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $92,231, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $54,474, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,275, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $87,751, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 62.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.5%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%).