Chickasaw vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,302,153 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 120.3 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,275, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $79,737, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,474, a difference of 1.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,215, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,026, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 42.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.47%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.2%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.53%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.64%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.2%).