Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,635,022 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $52,217, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $106,629, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $61,628, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $50,984, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $42,837, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $66,118, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.32%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (62.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.81%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.9%).