Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,420,937 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.821. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.700% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 700.4 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $50,984, a difference of 11.1%), per capita income ($57,953 compared to $52,217, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $61,628, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $66,118, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $111,669, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.27%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).