Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,787,497 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 69.0 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $50,984, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $61,628, a difference of 7.3%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $115,847, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $42,837, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $66,118, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($55,082 compared to $52,217, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.36%), family households (63.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.4%).