Eastern European vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,730,893 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Eastern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Eastern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Eastern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 80.6 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,546 compared to $115,847, a difference of 8.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($120,684 compared to $111,669, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($66,472 compared to $61,628, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($45,385 compared to $42,837, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,066 compared to $50,984, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.89%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.76%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.5%).