Iroquois vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,100,856 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 37.3 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $52,217, a difference of 33.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $111,669, a difference of 28.0%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $115,847, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,984, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,837, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.4%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (62.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.6%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 62.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 50.2%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.2%).