Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,375,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 51.7 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,984, a difference of 6.3%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $52,217, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,880 compared to $115,847, a difference of 0.030%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $61,628, a difference of 0.80%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $66,118, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.0%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.060%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and female poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 9.4%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.080%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%).